Saturday, July 29, 2017

Exploring the Matrix: Knowledge, part 1


Exploring the Matrix:  The Perception Axis—Knowledge, part 1



"From a drop of water.  .  .  a logician could infer the possibility of an Atlantic or a Niagara without having seen or heard of one or the other.  So all life is a great chain, the nature of which is known whenever we are shown a single link of it.”[1]  Sherlock Holmes, A Study in Scarlet



The connection between faith and knowledge may seem obvious, but not to everyone. Existentialists and Postmodernists reject the idea of objective truth, since we are so trapped within our cultural worldview that if “real” truth exists at all, it is unknowable.  Hyperreal religions argue that faith can exist without truth, and that our commitment to a narrative is all that matters.

Reality does matter. There’s a story told about when the Christian apologist Francis Schaeffer sat in the home of an existentialist discussing philosophy. The existentialist argued that they could never fully communicate, since each person’s perception of reality is different.  Schaeffer interrupted him and asked if he could have a cup of tea. The man graciously poured him some.  Between sips, Schaeffer declared ‘Now, sir, we are communicating.”  Our interaction in the real proves there is a common ground of truth.

Faith must stand up to reality. That’s why we must use our minds to fully believe. 

Christians have often justly been accused of mental laziness.  Mark Noll described well the evangelical church:



The scandal of the evangelical mind is that there is not much of an evangelical mind.  An extraordinary range of virtues is found among the sprawling throngs of evangelical Protestants in North America, including great sacrifice in spreading the message of salvation in Jesus Christ, open-hearted generosity to the needy, heroic personal exertion on behalf of troubled individuals, and the unheralded sustenance of countless churches and parachurch communities.  Notwithstanding all their other virtues, however, American evangelicals are not  exemplary for their thinking, and they have not been so for several generations.[2]



This mental lassitude comes from our overindulgence and lack of mental exercise.  We gorge ourselves on useless information, without digesting it, until we cannot tell what is trustworthy and important.

Critical thinking is hard but important work. It yields three kinds of fruit-- knowledge of God,  self, and  the world around us.

Knowledge of God comes through study of the Scriptures.  Not everyone is gifted in study, but all of us can apply ourselves more diligently to reading and studying for ourselves.  The more time we spend in the Bible, the more we will understand its meaning. 

Knowledge of self comes from our own objective self-assessment.  We must have a clear, well-defined set of personal values based on good judgment and careful thought. With these virtues in place, we are able to let reason guide us even in tough situations.

Knowledge of the world around us yields an understanding of the times.  1 Chronicles 12:32 says “The men of Issachar. . .  understood the times and knew what Israel should do.” Understanding the times is necessary for success. 

Study may be hard work, but can also be fun work.  In Habits of the Mind, James Sire gives this definition of a Christian intellectual:



“An intellectual is one who loves ideas, is dedicated to developing them, criticizing them, clarifying them, turning them over and over, seeing their implications, stacking them atop one another, arranging them, sitting silent while new ones pop up and old ones seem to rearrange themselves, playing with them, punning them with their terminology, laughing at them, watching them clash, picking up the pieces, starting over, judging them, withholding judgment about them, changing them, bringing them into contact with their counterparts in other systems of thought, inviting them to dine and have a ball, but also suiting them for service in workaday life—

--A Christian intellectual is all of the above to the glory of God.” [3]



Children have a natural love of learning. The instinctively want to use their minds to learn and grow. Just as a person cannot be happy without some physical exercise, so we cannot be happy without exercising our minds.  Whenever we discourage thinking and exploration, we cut ourselves off from the greatest characteristic of our nature that makes us the most like God-our capacity to understand the world around us.

Doubt is not the enemy of faith—it is faith’s ally. Questioning makes faith stronger not weaker. In  order to get stronger in our intellectual understanding of God, ourselves, and the universe, we need to develop four cardinal virtues of the mind.  They are:

1.  Curiosity.  Thinking believers are not content to be generally correct about the truth.  Curiosity should never be suppressed. We should never fear learning the truth.  Truth can only help us in the end. 

2.  Humility. Thinking believers listen when other people talk, and pay attention to new ideas. They realize that truth is larger and of greater importance than proving our own opinions.

3.  Persistence.  Knowledge is not an easy quest; anyone who has suffered through college or graduate school knows this. But the rewards are worth it, if we continue to seek the truth. 

4.  Clarity.  Whatever we know, we should strive to express clearly.  A knowledgeable person does not just work at knowing, he also works at expressing knowledge.  A person, who cannot explain clearly what they believe, is not as smart as they think.  We must work just as hard at putting knowledge in simple language as we do as discovering it. 

 


Why is the study of theology important to people of faith? Is it possible to think Biblically without thinking theologically?  What is the difference between being intellectual and intellectualism?  Is it easy to tell the difference?  How can you tell a real intellectual from one who simply acts like one?

Write what you think about it in the comments below.   



[1] Sir Arthur Conan Doyle A Study in Scarlet Electronic Text Library, University of Virginia Library, 1995, http://etext.lib.virginia.edu/toc/modeng/public/DoyScar.html, p.  16. 
[2] Mark Noll, The Scandal of the Evangelical Mind, p.   3. 
[3]James Sire, Habits of the Min        d (Intervarsity Press, Downers Grove, Ill) 2000, p.  27-28.

No comments:

Post a Comment